Court Denies Fees In 'Objectively Specious' Trade Secrets Suit

By Andrew Karpan · October 23, 2024, 10:50 PM EDT

A Seattle federal judge has agreed that a dental health insurer litigated an "objectively specious" trade secrets lawsuit against two of its former company officials, but ruled that not enough showed...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

Dental Health Services Inc et al v. Miller et al

Case Number

Court

Washington Western

Nature of Suit

Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016)

Date Filed

March 15, 2023

Recent Articles By Andrew

October 02, 2024
Avadel Tells Fed. Circ. It Should Be Free To Test Sleep Drug
September 26, 2024
2nd Circ. Denies Jury Trial In Abbott Labs Gray Market Case
September 09, 2024
Purdue Sees Another OxyContin Patent Axed
September 05, 2024
Nvidia, Microsoft Face Patent, Cartel Allegations In Texas Suit
August 09, 2024
Valeant's Legal Gripe A Total 'Nothingburger,' Justices Told
July 11, 2024
GSK Asks Judge To Rule In Teva IP Case, Citing Opioid Deals
July 09, 2024
South Africa Drops J&J Probe After TB Drug Price Cuts
June 26, 2024
Ga. High Court Told To Skip Inventor's 'Clerical Mistake' Fight
June 13, 2024
IP Forecast: Cooley Atty Faces DQ Bid Over Past Patent Work
June 10, 2024
5 Teva Inhaler Patents Kicked Out Of Orange Book